RSS

Posted on April 7, 2014 in Life, the Universe and Everything by Jay5 Comments »

TheEdge

The television news this evening was full of the death of Peaches Geldof.

I don’t often watch the news, but OH had put the TV on ready for our nightly dose of ‘Enterprise’ while cooking our dinner so I was a captive audience. As I listened, I felt very sad that a young woman was dead at only twenty-five years of age leaving two young children. The husband, poor guy, only got a brief mention some time into the coverage, and his name was hardly mentioned at all. There’s some kind of mystery about her death, so there will be an investigation, which is doubly hard for the family.

But as I listened, and the coverage went on, and on, and on* I began to get saddened, not just by the death of this young woman and the loss of her, particularly to her two children, but by the amount of time given to this one celebrity death.

As it continued (and started to repeat itself), and began dragging up her mother’s death and the tragedy which seems to stalk the Geldof family and the pictures that had been posted on Twitter, I went from saddened to irritated and finally arrived at angry.

How dare they? That’s what I was thinking.

How dare they devalue the grief and loss of every other person who has lost a loved one today? What is it that makes Paula Yates’ daughter more important that my friend Julie who died a short while ago, also a young woman? What makes her more important than my brother-in-law who died unexpectedly last week? What makes her more important than another friend’s mother who also passed away a few days ago? How DARE they profit from the quite scary emotional intensity of celebrity cultists to elevate one single young woman above countless beloved and worthy citizens who have passed away unsung today?

The news also broke today of the death of Mickey Rooney, who was also a celebrity and arguably contributed more to the entertainment world than Peaches Geldof-Cohen, but the coverage of his death was much lower-key, much less extensive and less wrought with emotion. Actually, I felt it was handled with a lot more respect.

OK, I hold up my hands in acknowledgement of the fact that this blog is titled ‘The Depp Effect’ in honour of one actor who is rather dear to me. Yes, I have rearranged my life at times to meet him, and to meet up with other fans in far-flung places, and I have a whole (bulging) drawer devoted to his movies, and posters all over the house, but let’s be honest: while he is indeed a handsome, charismatic and extremely talented actor who also happens to be sweet and generous and has given to the world truckloads of entertainment, he is still just one man who has his own failings and his own sadnesses, and his own family who have a right to privacy. Straight up, I would feel this type of news coverage was wrong whichever celebrity it was: Johnny Depp, Mickey Rooney, or your own old Grandpa.

Mickey Rooney was a child actor. He worked pretty much all of his life, crawling onto the stage at the age of fourteen months and landing his first proper role at the age of six years old. He served in the military, and was beloved by generations. He was one of the few silent movie actors who made it into film and TV with a long and illustrious career. Why didn’t he get more air-time today? Is it because he was in his nineties when he died? Does that make him of no account, and his family’s grief of no account?

My brother-in-law was a vicar with a quiet, wickedly dry sense of humour. My friend was a sweet, funny, charming and sparkly girl. My other friend’s mother .. well, I didn’t know her, and I don’t know how old she was, but she mattered, just the same. How do we measure one person’s importance against another?

I am not going to say that any of the other people mentioned in this post were worth more than Peaches Geldof-Cohen. I have absolutely no right to judge that, especially since I really know nothing about her. But what I do believe is that they weren’t worth any less.

And I also believe that media companies who cover celebrity deaths, doing their best to outdo each other in playing to the emotions of the scandal-obsessed public, should be ashamed of themselves.

Do they not realise – or do they not care – that in raking over the coals like this and making one celebrity the focus of the whole evening’s news that they are causing pain to countless grieving people whose loved ones also died today? And, by the way, probably intensifying the pain of the family concerned, who are now being mugged for interviews, information and snippets of scandal?

And they are also devaluing everything else of major importance going on in the wider world.

Look. By all means cover the death of anyone you like in the national news if you think it would be of public interest, but for discussion, speculation, wringing of hands, etc, would it not be more appropriate to run it as a ‘special’ – a programme devoted to the subject for those who were truly interested? Not as a half-hour long news segment. As far as I could see, the ‘news’ part was all over in the first ten minutes.

* We weren’t in at the start of the story and I can almost guarantee that it went on for at least an hour, if not more. We stopped watching after 20 minutes.

Posted on April 3, 2014 in Food and Drink by Jay12 Comments »

StrangeDrink

This may just be the strangest drink I have ever tasted!

As you may be able to read from the label, it is composed of apples, celery and kale, with a touch of kiwi. It is supposed to give you nearly two portions of your ‘five a day’. It tasted .. um … it tasted … Well, it tasted like none of its components, that’s for sure. The flavour was not exactly unpleasant, but to be frank, I’m not sure how often I’d want to experience it.

But wait! The scientists, along with our Beloved Leaders, seem to have decided that despite the fact that most of us don’t manage to eat five portions of fruit and vegetables each day, the guidelines should really change to seven portions a day.

I – along with many other people – question whether this is achievable. I used to record all of my daily food intake on Spark People, which is a pretty useful site intended to help people lose weight or otherwise manage their nutrition. If you input exactly what you have eaten each day, it will tell you how your diet measures up to the recommended daily intake of all the main food groups (protein, fats and carbohydrates) and the most necessary vitamins and minerals.

I never once managed to achieve the full recommended daily intake (RDA) on basic mineral requirements like calcium, magnesium etc, and hardly ever got the full dose of all the vitamins either, despite following a very healthy diet of lean meat, fruit, dairy, nuts and many, many vegetables along with a moderate amount of carbohydrates. To do so, I had to supplement with tablets.

Now, I live in a rich country, and I have enough money to go and buy what I need. I know a little bit about how our bodies work, and I know enough to be able to do the simple maths required for these calculations. I have read (until my brain feels like exploding) about good nutrition, what to eat, what not to eat, what to limit and how to best prepare and cook (or not cook) the components. So I can’t help feeling that if I can’t do it, there must be precious few people who can. What’s more, the greater part of the world comes nowhere even close (for various reasons, one being poverty), and yet we are still one of the unhealthiest nations on earth.

At this point, I’d like to say that if the government would only impose a tax on sugar commensurate with the taxes on alcohol and cigarettes, it would go an awful long way to solving one of our biggest nutritional failings, and at the same time raise a huge amount of money for the national budget, but they won’t do it. They’d rather blame us for failing to eat enough vegetables.

I asked two different professional nutritionists to advise me on how to eat so that I could lose weight and at the same time not fall short on any of the vitamins and minerals, and do you know what? Neither one of them could do it.

Personally, I believe these RDAs are basically a load of codswallop. And now they want us to add even more fruit and veg each day.

Well. today I did manage to eat six portions of fruit and veg. I slice of fig and almond wedge accounted for one, a tin of tomato soup (yes, I ate the whole thing) two portions, one fresh pear was another portion. Then later I ate a large serving of brussels sprouts, and a smaller one of mixed carrot, mushroom and celery with my dinner. But here’s the thing: I have to be very careful these days just which fruit and veg I eat and when, because otherwise it plays merry hell with my acid reflux.

No doubt that drink up there helps, in its small way, to make it possible to suck down kale and celery etc, but it would have to be an occasional treat*, because these things are expensive. I don’t know if you could reproduce that drink at home .. Possibly, with the right equipment, but here’s the question:

Would you really want to?

If you’re interested, I logged my food intake for today (a pretty average day for me) with Spark People and saved the nutrition report. I came out quite well, really, considering I wasn’t even trying. Well within the target calorie count, and with the main food groups in the correct proportions, and I’m even within the guidelines for salt – but just look at how woefully short of the targets for potassium, magnesium and calcium I am!

* I use this word with a little hesitation.

Posted on April 2, 2014 in Life, the Universe and Everything by Jay3 Comments »

WW-Band

Wordless Wednesday is a blog hop!

MarchOne-5a

I missed this last month, but I do love a good photo blogging challenge! This one (oh, ha ha!) is from ‘A lil hoohaa’. The challenge is to provide five photos, taken during the designated month, all illustrating the given theme. This month’s theme, as you see, is ‘One’.

So, I’ve just trawled through my March photo files to see what I could find, and I came up with these.

At the top, one classic red phone box, seemingly in the middle of nowhere. It’s actually in Wennington, one of the most picturesque and well-preserved villages around these parts. It is full of thatched cottages, old-fashioned signposts and even has a duck pond (which, coincidentally, had one solitary duck on it when we passed through).

Around the same time, early in March, I took this picture of one of my dogs, Jeffie.

MarchOne-3a

His coat must surely be one of the most unusual colours, but you see, he is black. And the trouble with a black dog is that the night is also black, and soon after dusk, he disappears from view – even when he is on his lead. That’s the reason he is now Hi Vis Jeffie.

While we are on the subject of dogs, here is a very rare picture of them both sharing ONE bed!

MarchOne-4

Now, if Jeffie had been in that bed first, there is no way that Sid would have got a look-in. He’d have been warned off in no uncertain terms. But because Sid was there first, and Jeffie desperately wanted that bed, he curled right up close to Sid so he could fit in too.

Next, I found a sweet picture of one of the twins in her doorway ‘Tigger’ bouncer. This one is Sophie, and her sister was in the doorway opposite. They had a whale of a time!

MarchOne-2

And lastly, yesterday I took my camera into the garden to take a few pictures of the spring flowers, and I found this little fellow, looking all new and velvety, on a climbing rose.

MarchOne-1

One solitary velvet mite. A bit bigger that the more common red spider mite, these are not saprophytes and do not feed on plants, but are parasitic on other (larger) insects.

If you’d like to join in with this challenge, pop on over to A Lil Hoohaa’s blog and grab the badge!